Back to Insights
Data Science8 min read

From Models to Money: Translating Data Science Into Business Value

By Caleb Bak•May 12, 2023

From Models to Money: Translating Data Science Into Business Value

Every data scientist can build a model with 95% accuracy. Few can build one that actually makes money. After working with 200+ companies at InfiniDataLabs, I've learned the difference isn't technical—it's strategic.

The graveyard of data science projects is filled with technically impressive models that never delivered business value. Here's how to avoid joining them.

The Accuracy Trap

Let me tell you about a project that haunts me.

A retail client hired us to build a customer churn prediction model. Our team was excited. We had great data, skilled data scientists, and clear objectives.

Three months later:

  • Model accuracy: 94%
  • Precision and recall: Excellent
  • Cross-validation scores: Outstanding
  • Business impact: Zero

    • Why? Because we optimized for the wrong thing.

    "A model that's 80% accurate but actionable is infinitely better than a model that's 95% accurate but unusable." - Hard-earned lesson
    Technical excellence doesn't equal business value. The best model is the one that changes decisions, not the one with the highest accuracy score.

    The Five Questions That Matter

    Before building any data science solution, answer these questions honestly:

    1. What Decision Does This Change?

    Bad answer: "It predicts customer churn."

    Good answer: "It tells the retention team which customers to call this week."

    The difference: Specificity. If you can't name the exact decision and decision-maker, you're building a science project, not a business solution.

    2. What's the Cost of Being Wrong?

    Bad answer: "We want the most accurate model possible."

    Good answer: "False positives cost us $50 in wasted outreach. False negatives cost us $1,200 in lost customer lifetime value."

    The difference: Understanding the asymmetric costs of errors changes how you optimize your model.

    10
    1: Average business impact ratio of different error types

    3. How Fast Do You Need the Answer?

    Bad answer: "As accurate as possible."

    Good answer: "We need predictions by Monday morning for the weekly call list."

    The difference: Sometimes a good-enough model that runs fast beats a perfect model that takes too long.

    4. What Action Will You Take?

    Bad answer: "We'll analyze the results and decide."

    Good answer: "Scores above 0.7 go to the retention team. Scores 0.4-0.7 get automated email campaigns. Below 0.4, no action."

    The difference: Pre-defined action thresholds ensure the model actually gets used.

    5. How Will You Measure Success?

    Bad answer: "Model accuracy and AUC score."

    Good answer: "Reduction in churn rate and ROI of retention spend."

    The difference: Business metrics, not model metrics.

    Real Case Study: From 95% Accuracy to $0 Impact

    Let me explain what went wrong with that retail churn model:

    What We Built

    Model specs:

  • Random Forest classifier
  • 94% accuracy
  • Identified 89% of churners correctly
  • Low false positive rate
  • Beautiful confusion matrix

    • Why It Failed

    Problem 1: Wrong Timing

  • Model predicted churn 90 days out
  • Retention team could only realistically intervene 30 days out
  • By the time they could act, the prediction was stale

    • Problem 2: No Action Threshold

  • Model output: Probability score 0-1
  • Retention team: "What do we do with this number?"
  • No clear guidance on when to intervene

    • Problem 3: Wrong Target Variable

  • Model predicted: Will customer churn in next 90 days?
  • Business actually needed: Will intervention prevent churn?
  • These are completely different questions

    • Problem 4: Ignored Costs

  • Retention calls cost $50 each
  • Only 20% of at-risk customers respond to intervention
  • Model recommended calling 10,000 customers
  • Cost: $500,000
  • Prevented churn value: $380,000
  • **Net result: Lost $120,000**
    • Always calculate the business case before deploying. A model can be technically correct but economically wrong.

    The Rebuild: How We Fixed It

    Version 2.0 Changes

    New Target Variable:

  • Old: Will customer churn?
  • New: Will customer respond positively to retention offer?

    • New Prediction Window:

  • Old: 90 days out
  • New: 30 days out (actionable timeframe)

    • New Output:

  • Old: Probability score
  • New: Three tier recommendation

    • - High priority (>70% response probability): Call immediately

    - Medium priority (40-70%): Automated email campaign

    - Low priority (<40%): Monitor only

    Cost-Benefit Analysis:

  • Built into model optimization
  • Weighted false positives by intervention cost
  • Weighted false negatives by lost customer value
  • Optimized for profit, not accuracy

    • Version 2.0 Results

    Model Performance:

  • Accuracy: 87% (dropped from 94%)
  • But optimized for business outcomes, not accuracy

    • Business Impact (6 months):

  • 3,200 high-priority customers identified
  • 1,840 successfully retained (57% success rate)
  • Average customer lifetime value: $1,200
  • Revenue saved: $2.2M
  • Intervention cost: $410K
  • **Net profit: $1.79M**

    • The difference? We built for business value, not technical perfection.

    The Framework: Data Science That Makes Money

    Here's the framework we use at InfiniDataLabs for every project:

    Phase 1: Business Understanding (Week 1)

    Don't talk about models. Talk about:

  • What decisions need to be made?
  • Who makes them and when?
  • What information do they currently have?
  • What's missing?
  • What actions will they take based on predictions?
  • How do we measure success?

    • Deliverable: One-page document describing the decision, timeline, and success metrics. If stakeholders can't agree on this, stop. Don't build the model yet.

    Phase 2: Economic Model (Week 1-2)

    Calculate the money:

  • What's the value of being right?
  • What's the cost of being wrong (both directions)?
  • What's the cost of the intervention?
  • What's the cost of no action?
  • At what accuracy does the model become profitable?

    • Deliverable: Spreadsheet showing ROI at different model performance levels. This tells you if the project is even worth pursuing.

    Phase 3: Data Assessment (Week 2-3)

    Reality check:

  • Do we have the data needed?
  • Is it clean enough?
  • Is there enough signal?
  • What's the baseline (how good is random guessing)?
  • What's the theoretical maximum performance?

    • Deliverable: Data quality report and feasibility assessment. Sometimes the answer is "this won't work with current data."

    Phase 4: Rapid Prototyping (Week 3-5)

    Build the simplest thing that could work:

  • Start with basic models (logistic regression, decision trees)
  • Focus on features that matter
  • Get to a working prototype fast
  • Test with real users immediately

    • Deliverable: Working prototype with real users testing it. Get feedback before building the fancy solution.

    Phase 5: Production Engineering (Week 6-8)

    Make it reliable:

  • Automated retraining pipelines
  • Monitoring and alerts
  • A/B testing framework
  • Fallback mechanisms
  • Documentation for operators

    • Deliverable: Production-ready system that doesn't need daily babysitting.

    Phase 6: Measurement and Iteration (Ongoing)

    Prove the value:

  • Track business metrics (not just model metrics)
  • A/B test against baseline
  • Measure actual ROI
  • Gather user feedback
  • Iterate based on learnings

    • Deliverable: Monthly business impact reports showing actual value created.

    Common Failure Patterns (And How to Avoid Them)

    Failure Pattern 1: Science Project Syndrome

    Symptoms:

  • Data scientists excited about the technical challenge
  • Long development cycles
  • Focus on model complexity
  • No clear business sponsor

    • Fix:

  • Require business sponsor approval before starting
  • Set 8-week maximum for MVP
  • Optimize for simplicity, not complexity
  • Weekly check-ins with business stakeholders

    • Failure Pattern 2: Perfect Data Fallacy

    Symptoms:

  • "We need to clean all the data first"
  • Endless data quality improvement projects
  • No models in production

    • Fix:

  • Build with imperfect data
  • Iterate and improve
  • 80/20 rule: Focus on the data issues that matter most
  • Ship something, measure, improve

    • Failure Pattern 3: Algorithm Shopping

    Symptoms:

  • Trying every new ML algorithm
  • Chasing marginal accuracy improvements
  • Lost sight of business problem

    • Fix:

  • Start with simplest model
  • Only add complexity if business impact justifies it
  • Remember: 80% accurate model in production beats 95% accurate model in development

    • Failure Pattern 4: "Deploy and Pray"

    Symptoms:

  • Model deployed without user training
  • No change management
  • Assumed people will use it
  • Surprised when they don't

    • Fix:

  • Train users extensively
  • Make it easy to use
  • Show clear value
  • Get champions who advocate for the solution
  • Iterate based on feedback

    • Real Examples: Data Science That Worked

    Example 1: Manufacturing Predictive Maintenance

    Business Problem:

  • Unplanned equipment downtime costing $50K/hour
  • Reactive maintenance too expensive
  • Preventive maintenance too frequent (unnecessary costs)

    • Simple Solution:

  • Sensor data from equipment
  • Basic time series analysis
  • Alert when patterns deviate from normal
  • Recommend inspection before failure

    • Results:

  • 34% reduction in unplanned downtime
  • 18% reduction in maintenance costs
  • $12M annual savings
  • Model accuracy: 79% (good enough!)

    • Key: Optimized for business outcomes (downtime reduction), not model accuracy.

    Example 2: E-commerce Dynamic Pricing

    Business Problem:

  • Static pricing leaving money on the table
  • Manual price adjustments too slow
  • Competitors changing prices constantly

    • Simple Solution:

  • Track competitor prices
  • Analyze price elasticity
  • Recommend optimal price by product and time
  • Humans approve recommendations

    • Results:

  • 8% revenue increase
  • 3% margin improvement
  • $22M annual impact
  • Paid back ML investment in 2 months

    • Key: Focused on interpretable recommendations, not black box automation.

    Example 3: Healthcare Readmission Risk

    Business Problem:

  • 30-day readmissions cost hospital $2M annually
  • Limited resources for follow-up care
  • Need to prioritize high-risk patients

    • Simple Solution:

  • Predict readmission risk at discharge
  • Top 20% get intensive follow-up
  • Middle 30% get standard follow-up
  • Bottom 50% get automated reminders

    • Results:

  • 27% reduction in readmissions
  • Better patient outcomes
  • $1.8M annual savings
  • Resource allocation optimized

    • Key: Clear action tiers based on risk scores.

    27%
    Readmission reduction from risk-based intervention

    Building Data Science Teams That Deliver Value

    The best data science teams have these characteristics:

    1. Business-First Mindset

    What this looks like:

  • Data scientists attend business strategy meetings
  • They speak in business terms, not just technical jargon
  • They push back on projects with unclear business value
  • They measure success in dollars, not accuracy points

    • 2. Scrappy Experimentation Culture

    What this looks like:

  • Bias toward action
  • Comfortable with "good enough"
  • Rapid prototyping before perfection
  • Learn from failures quickly

    • 3. Cross-Functional Collaboration

    What this looks like:

  • Data scientists pair with domain experts
  • Regular check-ins with business users
  • Engineering partnership from day one
  • Product thinking, not just model building

    • 4. Focus on Deployment

    What this looks like:

  • Production deployment is part of the project, not an afterthought
  • MLOps infrastructure is prioritized
  • Monitoring and maintenance are built in
  • Models that don't deploy don't count as done

    • Your Action Plan: Making Data Science Pay Off

    If you're a data science leader:

    1. Audit current projects: Which ones have clear business value? Kill the rest.

    2. Require business cases: No project starts without documented ROI potential.

    3. Measure business impact: Track revenue/cost impact, not just model metrics.

    4. Get close to the business: Your team needs to understand business strategy deeply.

    5. Ship frequently: Better to have 10 simple models in production than 1 perfect model in development.

    If you're a business leader:

    1. Be specific: Don't ask for "AI" or "machine learning." Ask for solutions to specific problems.

    2. Allocate resources for iteration: First version won't be perfect. Budget for v2 and v3.

    3. Measure appropriately: Judge data science by business impact, not technical sophistication.

    4. Invest in infrastructure: Good MLOps infrastructure pays dividends across all projects.

    5. Be patient but not too patient: Give projects time to deliver, but kill ones that aren't showing progress.

    The Bottom Line

    The difference between data science that creates value and data science that doesn't comes down to one thing: relentless focus on business outcomes over technical perfection.

    Every decision should be driven by:

  • What decision does this change?
  • What action will be taken?
  • What's the economic value?
  • How do we measure success?

    • Build models that make money, not models that win Kaggle competitions.

    At InfiniDataLabs, we've seen this pattern hundreds of times: The companies that succeed with data science are those that treat it as a business discipline, not a technical one.

    The goal isn't to build impressive models. It's to make better decisions that create value.

    *The best data science is invisible. Users don't think "that's a great model," they think "that helped me make a better decision."*

    Tags

    Data ScienceROIBusiness StrategyAnalyticsML Operations

    Sources & References

    CB

    About Caleb Bak

    Serial entrepreneur, founder & CEO of InfiniDataLabs and HireGecko, COO of UMaxLife, and managing partner at Wisrem LLC. Building intelligent solutions that transform businesses across AI, recruitment, healthcare, and investment markets.

    Learn more about Caleb →

    Enjoyed This Article?

    Subscribe to get more insights like this delivered to your inbox.

    Subscribe to Newsletter